CJFE Welcomes Positive Decisions in Two Supreme Court Defamation Cases
"In recognizing this new defence the Supreme Court has taken a much-needed step forward in protecting free expression in
"We are delighted that the Supreme Court has provided such clear guidance on this issue," stated journalist and CJFE Board member Kelly Toughill. "These twin decisions will encourage the kind of public service journalism that is essential to a healthy society. Not only were both decisions unanimous, they contain strong language about the value of free debate and communication in
Cusson v. Quan (
The defence is available not just to journalists, but to all publishers, as the Court specifically recognizes that emerging online sources of information are important to the debate about public affairs. The Court also adopts a broad definition of the "public interest", to include not just government and political matters, or the activities of "public figures", but also the debate on any issue on which "some segment of the public" has a "genuine stake in knowing about the matter".
The new defence sets out requirements that the subject matter is one of legitimate public concern, the allegation arises from a credible source and the defendant conducts itself responsibly in the circumstances. These decisions by the Supreme Court build on a previous decision delivered in
Canadian Journalists for Free Expression (CJFE) is an association of more than 300 journalists, editors, publishers, producers, students and others who work to promote and defend free expression and press freedom in
For further information: CJFE Manager, Julie Payne at (416) 515-9622 x. 226
Share this article