MFDA Hearing Panel issues Reasons for Decision in the matter of Grace Wong Uy

TORONTO, June 14, 2018 /CNW/ - A Hearing Panel of the Central Regional Council of the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada ("MFDA") has issued its Reasons for Decision dated June 13, 2018 in connection with a settlement hearing held in Toronto, Ontario on May 31, 2018 in the matter of Grace Wong Uy ("Respondent").

In its Reasons for Decision, the Hearing Panel confirmed the sanctions imposed on the Respondent. In particular, the Respondent:

• a prohibition from conducting securities related business in any capacity while in the employ of or associated with any MFDA Member for a period of one year;
• shall pay a fine to the MFDA in the amount of $31,000 as follows:

1. $1,000 payable on or before the date of the settlement hearing;
2. $30,000 payable in 12 monthly instalments of $2,500 each, commencing one month from the date the Settlement Agreement is accepted;

• shall pay costs in the amount of $5,000; and
• shall in the future comply with all MFDA By-laws, Rules and Policies, and all applicable securities legislation and regulation made thereunder, including MFDA Rules 1.1.1, 1.2.1(c) (now MFDA Rule 1.3), 2.1.1, 2.4.2, 2.5.1 and 1.1.2, and the requirements of sections 13.7 and 13.8 of National instrument 31-103

In the Settlement Agreement dated May 28, 2018, the Respondent admitted that:

1. between 2012 and 2013, she engaged in securities related business which was not carried on for the account of the Member or conducted through its facilities by recommending, selling, facilitating the sale of, and/or making referrals in respect of investments to at least 10 clients totaling approximately $360,000, contrary to the Member's policies and procedures, MFDA Rules 1.1.1, 2.1.1, 2.4.2, 2.5.1 and 1.1.2, and the requirements of sections 13.7 and 13.8 of National instrument 31-103;
2. between 2012 and 2013, she referred clients to Approved Person HL to purchase investments outside the Member, and received at least $18,000 in referral fees for doing so, thereby participating in an unapproved referral arrangement to which the Member was not a party, contrary to the Member's policies and procedures, MFDA Rules 2.1.1, 2.4.2, 2.5.1 and 1.1.2, and the requirements of sections 13.7 and 13.8 of National Instrument 31-103; and
3. between December 18, 2015 and January 24, 2017, she misled the Member and the MFDA during its investigations into her conduct with respect to her knowledge and involvement in referring clients to purchase investments outside the Member, contrary to MFDA Rule 2.1.1.

Copies of the Reasons for Decision and the Settlement Agreement are available on the MFDA website at www.mfda.ca. During the period described in the Reasons for Decision, the Respondent conducted business in Richmond Hill, Ontario.

The MFDA is the self-regulatory organization for Canadian mutual fund dealers, regulating the operations, standards of practice and business conduct of its Members and their approximately 82,000 Approved Persons with a mandate to protect investors and the public interest. For more information about the MFDA's complaint and enforcement processes, as well as links to 'Check an Advisor' and other Investor Tools, visit the For Investors page on the MFDA website.

SOURCE Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada

please contact: Charles Toth, Director, Litigation, 416-943-4619, [email protected]

Related Links

http://www.mfda.ca